Should the Government Spend Part of its Budget on Foreign Aid?
This article unpacks this polarizing issue, exploring the complexities surrounding government spending on foreign aid and examining the multifaceted implications it holds for both the donating nation and the international community at large.
In today’s global world, the question of whether governments should allocate a portion of their massive budgets to foreign aid remains a topic of fervent debate. Advocates argue that such contributions promote global stability, alleviate poverty, and enhance diplomatic relations. Conversely, opponents emphasize the need to prioritize domestic concerns and argue that foreign aid may not yield significant returns.
The issue is whether government spending should be allocated to assist other countries and what this can do for the stability of all nations.
Seventy-five years of U.S. foreign assistance has produced more fiction than fact when it comes to how American tax dollars are being spent around the world.
In the interest of providing taxpayers with information about the value of their federal investment in this regard, it might be helpful to look at some of the top myths surrounding foreign aid, and how these myths compare with reality.
Before we can assess if foreign aid spending is burdensome or not, we first must establish what that load looks like on the United States economy.
The largest contributing countries measured in USD:
- United States: $34.26 billion
- Germany: $24.99 billion
- United Kingdom: $19.40 billion
- Japan: $14.17 billion
- France: 12.15%
The US government spends about $104.78 per American each year on development aid.
In comparison, to other countries and the total budget of the United States government, the amount of regular foreign aid earmarked is not a great deal.
Harvard Political Review has this to say:
“Public perception of foreign aid matters because ordinary Americans play a sizable role in policymaking. Widespread support for humanitarian spending and pressure on legislators can contribute to the prioritization of foreign aid, but the beliefs stated above are obstacles to achieving this widespread support. The truth is that American foreign aid produces positive outcomes for its recipients, contains safeguards against corruption, and promotes national security and economic growth. The U.S. should prioritize foreign aid over military spending and re-establish itself as a world leader in diplomacy, economic development, and global health.”
Aid to developing countries can help poor countries grow out of poverty. But this is not always the case. Foreign aid can have the opposite effect where foreign aid kills local industries and the receiving countries are stuck in aid dependency.
We can conclude that the amount of annual aid is not great enough to establish a certain burden on the United States economy. Furthermore, sending aid to other countries can forge strong international relationships and help developing countries in supporting their growth needs.
CITATIONS:
